0
It’s entirely up to you, if it resonates or not. Some like it and others think it’s entirely non-valid. It’s called Solar Chart, and I like it because it feels to me like ancient archetypical astrology before math and calculations.
This is how astrologyweekly is describing it:
Definition of Solar Astrology The presumption that the Solar Horoscope is of value only as a make-shift when an exact hour of birth is unobtainable, is rapidly giving way to a realization of its genuine merits. Strictly speaking, it is not an hour-scope but a day-scope; yet it is the same cycle of hour-to-hour dally experiences through a rising series of sensitive points, whether it begins with an ascendant degree or with the omnipotent Sun degree.
I’m still wrapping my mind around it.
A friend of mine sends me horoscopes. If don’t know where she gets them. The more I read about these, the more I am puzzled by general statements made about houses.
For example, I am Pisces, and this month (October 5th, 2012), Saturn moves from Libra to Scorpio. These horoscopes conclude that Saturn is moving from the 8th house to the 9th house for all Pisces. My understanding is that the beginning of the first house depends on the Ascendant, which is depending on the birth time.
How can such general statements be made about house transitions for all Pisces? Is this really valid?